Connect with us

Movies News

‘We Bought a Zoo’: John Michael Higgins’ Performance Is Worth Remembering

Published

on

‘We Bought a Zoo’: John Michael Higgins’ Performance Is Worth Remembering

We Bought a Zoo is not a particularly good movie. Cameron Crowe’s one foray into family-friendly filmmaking is a feature stuck straddling between two creative impulses. Crowe wants to make one of his conventional inspirational dramas. But unlike on his prior directorial efforts, he has the responsibility of delivering a family-friendly movie that audiences can flock to in the holiday season.

Crowe tries to make both of these disparate ambitions coexist peacefully. Unlike the human and animal denizens of the titular zoo in We Bought a Zoo, though, these creative pursuits don’t work together well. In the process of trying to serve several masters, this Crowe directorial effort ends up pleasing nobody. But for one scene, a performance from John Michael Higgins brings some much-needed life to We Bought a Zoo and reflects the kind of movie it could’ve been.

Advertisement

RELATED: Cameron Crowe Looks Back on ‘Elizabethtown,’ Reflects on His Career, & Shares His ‘Jerry Maguire’ Sequel Idea

Midway through We Bought a Zoo, it’s time for Benjamin Mee (Matt Damon) and the other main characters to get through an important step in relaunching this zoo: An inspection. If they want to open this place up to the public, then everything needs to be safe and up to code. This is where Walter Ferris (Higgins) comes in. Arriving onto the scene with more tools at his disposal than Batman’s utility belt, Ferris makes it no secret that he’s dubious about the prospect of a family-run zoo being capable of opening up to the public. He’s also adamant that this place will never be able to meet the standards necessary for it to be a proper public attraction.


This character functions as a conventional kid’s movie antagonist, complete with archly drawn writing and acting. If Ferris sounds like he doesn’t at all belong in a movie where Mee tells his son in front of a tiger cage about how many seconds of courage it takes to change your life, you would be correct. That disparity, though, is a key reason why Ferris proves to be the most memorable part of We Bought a Zoo by a significant margin. Whenever he comes on-screen, a wall-to-wall schmaltz-fest comes alive simply by hosting a character who shouldn’t exist in this project at all.

Even the technical aspects of the production seem to get an extra jolt of vibrancy whenever Ferris comes on-screen. As the camera cuts from Ferris’s concerned face to his tape measurer, editor Mark Livolsi employs sharp cuts meant to signify the character’s interior sense of grand importance. Typically, the editing in We Bought a Zoo is bog-standard and doesn’t do much to accentuate what’s going on on-screen. For moments involving Ferris, though, Livolsi uses well-timed edits to convey the mindset of a guy who believes his miniature notepad is the equivalent of Excalibur.


Advertisement

The character doesn’t just benefit from these aspects of We Bought a Zoo, though. It helps that he’s performed by none other than Higgins. This character actor may not be a name you immediately recognize, but if you’ve watched any major comedies in the last few decades, you’re bound to have encountered his work (Pitch Perfect, Bad Teacher, Bob’s Burgers). Higgins has more than earned his prominent place in modern comedies on the big and small screen thanks to his deft ability to immediately establish memorable personalities and his quick wit. If you need someone to come in and lend a distinctive aura to a supporting player in your story, Higgins is your guy.

This gift is put to great use with Ferris in We Bought a Zoo. The moment he steps into the titular location, Higgins portrays Ferris with an aloof air that’s so much more amusingly pronounced than the other characters in the film. His expert skills with comic timing, meanwhile, liven up even the most tired lines that he’s handed. Some of these quips get much of their humor from how Ferris never hesitates to critique shortcomings in the zoo that he’s been tasked with inspecting. In a movie full of syrupy attempts to tug at the heartstrings, there’s a delightful unsanded edges quality to the performance from Higgins.


What a contrast he is to the film’s primary performers like Matt Damon and Scarlett Johansson, who are delicately carrying around their respective characters’ personas with a detached air. This is seemingly out of concern of undercutting the thoughtful nature of We Bought a Zoo. Happily, Higgins just dives right into depicting Ferris as archly as possible, the sanctity of We Bought a Zoo’s script be damned.

Higgins makes Ferris a guy you love to hate, a person whose comical obsession with the minutiae of zoo upkeeping is just not something you run into every day. He’s a welcome contrast to the other We Bought a Zoo characters in many ways, but especially in his specificness. Mee’s central plight in the movie may involve porcupines and lions, but it’s cut from the same cloth as so many other single dads in live-action family movies. His kids, particularly his oldest withdrawn son, are also characters who could’ve come from any other movie. There’s just not enough that’s immediately distinctive about this family.


Advertisement

For a brief sequence, though, Ferris provides a welcome escape from the generic adventures of the Mee menagerie. In the process, he makes one wonder what a better version of We Bought a Zoo could’ve looked like. What if the movie was as interested in making all of its characters as memorable as Ferris? What if the production had employed more character actors instead of just leaning on predictable A-list talent that looks adrift in this affair? The inherent shortcomings in We Bought a Zoo will already leave you yearning for something better.

However, the flashes of inspiration that come on whenever Ferris appears make you realize this is not a doomed affair. We Bought a Zoo could’ve been better if it housed more people and performances like this one that feels more at home with the inherently ludicrous premise of the movie. Why try to make a film where Matt Damon feeding zebras seems “respectable” when you can take a cue from the performance of Higgins and just utilize this story as an opportunity to go memorably over the top?


Alas, the film we have is the film we have, and the result of We Bought a Zoo is an average and largely forgettable family movie. It’s the kind of project whose tenth anniversary largely comes and goes without fanfare. However, that doesn’t mean the better parts of it, like the performance from John Michael Higgins, should go ignored. Especially since, in this case, the lone great part of We Bought a Zoo not only suggests a superior feature but also gives one a chance to appreciate a talented comedic character actor.


Advertisement

Movies News

Review: SAMARITAN, A Sly Stallone Superhero Stumble

Published

on

By

Review: SAMARITAN, A Sly Stallone Superhero Stumble

Hitting the three-quarter-century mark usually means a retirement home, a nursing facility, or if you’re lucky to be blessed with relatively good health and savings to match, living in a gated community in Arizona or Florida.

For Sylvester Stallone, however, it means something else entirely: starring in the first superhero-centered film of his decades-long career in the much-delayed Samaritan. Unfortunately for Stallone and the audience on the other side of the screen, the derivative, turgid, forgettable results won’t get mentioned in a career retrospective, let alone among the ever-expanding list of must-see entries in a genre already well past its peak.

For Stallone, however, it’s better late than never when it involves the superhero genre. Maybe in getting a taste of the MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe) with his walk-on role in the Guardians of the Galaxy sequel several years ago, Stallone thought anything Marvel can do, I can do even better (or just as good in the nebulous definition of the word).

Advertisement

The property Stallone and his team found for him, Samaritan, a little-known graphic novel released by a small, almost negligible, publisher, certainly takes advantage of Stallone’s brute-force physicality and his often underrated talent for near-monosyllabic brooding (e.g., the Rambo series), but too often gives him to little do or say as the lone super-powered survivor, the so-called “Samaritan” of the title, of a lifelong rivalry with his brother, “Nemesis.” Two brothers entered a fire-ravaged building and while both were presumed dead, one brother did survive (Stallone’s Joe Smith, a garbageman by day, an appliance repairman by night).

In the Granite City of screenwriter Bragi F. Schut (Escape Room, Season of the Witch), the United States, and presumably the rest of the world, teeters on economic and political collapse, with a recession spiraling into a depression, steady gigs difficult, if not impossible, to obtain, and the city’s neighborhoods rocked by crime and violence. No one’s safe, not even 13-year-old Sam (Javon Walker), Joe’s neighbor.

When he’s not dodging bullies connected to a gang, he’s falling under the undue influence of Cyrus (Pilou Asbæk), a low-rent gang leader with an outsized ego and the conviction that he and only he can take on Nemesis’s mantle and along with that mantle, a hammer “forged in hate,” to orchestrate a Bane-like plan to plunge the city into chaos and become a wealthy power-broker in the process.

Schut’s woefully underwritten script takes a clumsy, haphazard approach to world-building, relying on a two-minute animated sequence to open Samaritan while a naive, worshipful Sam narrates Samaritan and Nemesis’s supposedly tragic, Cain and Abel-inspired backstory. Schut and director Julius Avery (Overlord) clumsily attempt to contrast Sam’s childish belief in messiah-like, superheroic saviors stepping in to save humanity from itself and its own worst excesses, but following that path leads to authoritarianism and fascism (ideas better, more thoroughly explored in Watchmen and The Boys).

While Sam continues to think otherwise, Stallone’s superhero, 25 years past his last, fatal encounter with his presumably deceased brother, obviously believes superheroes are the problem and not the solution (a somewhat reasonable position), but as Samaritan tracks Joe and Sam’s friendship, Sam giving Joe the son he never had, Joe giving Sam the father he lost to street violence well before the film’s opening scene, it gets closer and closer to embracing, if not outright endorsing Sam’s power fantasies, right through a literally and figuratively explosive ending. Might, as always, wins regardless of how righteous or justified the underlying action.

It’s what superhero audiences want, apparently, and what Samaritan uncritically delivers via a woefully under-rendered finale involving not just unconvincing CGI fire effects, but a videogame cut-scene quality Stallone in a late-film flashback sequence that’s meant to be subversively revelatory, but will instead lead to unintentional laughter for anyone who’s managed to sit the entirety of Samaritan’s one-hour and 40-minute running time.

Advertisement

Samaritan is now streaming worldwide on Prime Video.

Samaritan

Cast
  • Sylvester Stallone
  • Javon ‘Wanna’ Walton
  • Pilou Asbæk

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movies News

Matt Shakman Is In Talks To Direct ‘Fantastic Four’

Published

on

By

According to a new report, Wandavision’s Matt Shakman is in talks to direct the upcoming MCU project, Fantastic Four. Marvel Studios has been very hush-hush regarding Fantastic Four to the point where no official announcements have been made other than the film’s release date. No casting news or literally anything other than rumors has been released regarding the project. We know that Fantastic Four is slated for release on November 8th, 2024, and will be a part of Marvel’s Phase 6. There are also rumors that the cast of the new Fantastic Four will be announced at the D23 Expo on September 9th.

Fantastic Four is still over two years from release, and we assume we will hear more news about the project in the coming months. However, the idea of the Fantastic Four has already been introduced into the MCU. John Krasinski played Reed Richards aka Mr. Fantastic in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. The cameo was a huge deal for fans who have been waiting a long time for the Fantastic Four to enter the MCU. When Disney acquired Twenty Century Fox in 2019 we assumed that the Fox Marvel characters would eventually make their way into the MCU. It’s been 3 years and we already have had an X-Men and Fantastic Four cameo – even if they were from another universe.

Deadline is reporting that Wandavision’s Matt Shakman is in talks to direct Fantastic Four. Shakman served as the director for Wandavision and has had an extensive career. He directed two episodes of Game of Thrones and an episode of The Boys, and he had a long stint on It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia. There is nothing official yet, but Deadline’s sources say that Shakman is currently in talks for the job and things are headed in the right direction.

Advertisement

To be honest, I was a bit more excited when Jon Watts was set to direct. I’m sure Shakman is a good director, but Watts proved he could handle a tentpole superhero film with Spider-Man: Homecoming. Wandavision was good, but Watts’ style would have been perfect for Fantastic Four. The film is probably one of the most anticipated films in Marvel’s upcoming slate films and they need to find the best person they can to direct. Is that Matt Shakman? It could be, but whoever takes the job must realize that Marvel has a lot riding on this movie. The other Fantastic Four films were awful and fans deserve better. Hopefully, Marvel knocks it out of the park as they usually do. You can see for yourself when Fantastic Four hits theaters on November 8th, 2024.

Film Synopsis: One of Marvel’s most iconic families makes it to the big screen: the Fantastic Four.

Source: Deadline

Continue Reading

Movies News

Dan Aykroyd, Chevy Chase Star in ‘Zombie Town’ Mystery Teen Romancer (Exclusive)

Published

on

By

Dan Aykroyd and Chevy Chase have entered Zombie Town, a mystery teen romancer based on author R.L. Stine’s book of the same name.

The indie, now shooting in Ontario, also stars Henry Czerny and co-teen leads Marlon Kazadi and Madi Monroe. The ensemble cast includes Scott Thompson and Bruce McCulloch of the Canadian comedy show Kids in the Hall.

Canadian animator Peter Lepeniotis will direct Zombie Town. Stine’s kid’s book sees a quiet town upended when 12-year-old Mike and his friend, Karen, see a horror movie called Zombie Town and unexpectedly see the title characters leap off the screen and chase them through the theater.

Zombie Town will premiere in U.S. theaters before streaming on Hulu and then ABC Australia in 2023.

“We are delighted to bring the pages of R.L. Stine’s Zombie Town to the screen and equally thrilled to be working with such an exceptional cast and crew on this production. A three-time Nickelodeon Kids Choice Award winner with book sales of over $500 million, R.L. Stine has a phenomenal track record of crafting stories that engage and entertain audiences,” John Gillespie, Trimuse Entertainment founder and executive producer, said in a statement.

Advertisement

Executive producers are Trimuse Entertainment, Toonz Media Group, Lookout Entertainment, Viva Pictures and Sons of Anarchy actor Kim Coates.  

Paco Alvarez and Mark Holdom of Trimuse negotiated the deal to acquire the rights to Stine’s Zombie Town book.

Continue Reading

Trending