Connect with us

Movies News

The Killing of a Sacred Deer Ending Explained

Published

on

The Killing of a Sacred Deer Ending Explained

Editor’s Note: The following contains spoilers for The Killing of A Sacred DeerIn some ways, The Killing of a Sacred Deer is Yorgos Lanthimos‘ most direct, explicitly stated narrative taken to its most direct, explicitly clear ending to date. Martin (Barry Keoghan) tells Dr. Steven Murphy (Colin Farrell) that, in light of Steven botching Martin’s father’s surgery resulting in his death, Steven’s family (Nicole Kidman, Raffey Cassidy, Sunny Suljic) will die from a mysterious illness with mysterious symptoms, unless Steven himself chooses one to kill. The family starts experiencing all of these symptoms (paralysis, lack of appetite, eyes bleeding), no matter what Steven does. So, Steven spins in a circle with a hat over his eyes and randomly shoots and kills his son Bob (Suljic). In the final scene, we see the Murphy family minus Bob at a diner. Martin walks in, looks at them without their youngest. And, satisfied, leaves the diner and leaves them be.

Totally makes sense, right? Uh…

Advertisement

RELATED: 9 Psychological Horror Movies That Will Seriously Mess with Your Head

Yes, from a nuts-and-bolts storytelling standpoint, Lanthimos and co-writer Efthymis Filippou‘s screenplay has its characters say exactly what’s gonna happen and then proceeds to let it happen. And thankfully, the film is not interested in the mechanics of how Martin can mystically will this poor family to undergo these horrors — while the film ramps up in pace as Steven tries to stop Martin’s actions, even resorting to kidnapping and torture, there is never a plot to uncover the “how” of his actions. No grand conspiracy, no examination of Martin’s past, no revelation of mythological superpowers. The closest moment we get to this kind of explanatory detective work comes from Steven’s wife Anna (Kidman) discovering through Steven’s partner Matthew (Bill Camp) that Steven was likely drunk during Martin’s father’s surgery — revealing not the source of Martin’s “powers,” but further “reason” that Steven deserves to be punished.


But: There is still much to discuss about Sacred Deer‘s ending, outside of the irrelevant “how” of Martin’s grip over the Murphy family. Namely, “why?” A question that everyone in the Murphy family seems interested in asking and accepting — from Anna’s examination of Steven’s past sins to the children’s complete willingness to take what’s happening at face value. The person who takes the longest to ask the question and accept his answer? Steven. And that just might explain his fate.

“Fate” is not a word I choose lightly. The Killing of a Sacred Deer is directly concerned with fate, with cosmic punishment of human hubris, with our so-called free will crumbling under the uncaringly cruel banalities of the universe. In exploring these themes, the film reminded me very much of a modern update on a Greek tragedy. And wouldn’t you know it, Sacred Deer is inspired by an ancient Greek tragedy: Euripides’ Iphigenia in Aulis (called out by Lanthimos and Filippou directly, in revealing that Cassidy’s Kim wrote an essay on Iphigenia for her high school class).


Advertisement

In the play, part of a trilogy Euripides wrote in his final years on earth, Agamemnon ponders whether or not to sacrifice his daughter Iphigenia to the goddess Artemis, who is purposefully stopping proper winds for Agamemnon’s fleet to successfully complete their invasion of Troy. Agamemnon’s fatal sin, his tragic flaw, if you will? Vanity — after the first wave of battles against Troy, he boasted that he was as skilled a battler as Artemis herself. As you might imagine, Artemis didn’t like that too much, demanding the blood sacrifice to bring Agamemnon back to earth. After furious debate among his family and fellow generals, Agamemnon decides to undergo the sacrifice, reasoning that angry Greeks eager for victory would kill his entire family if he didn’t.

In some manuscripts and translations of the play, though it’s up for debate whether it’s part of Euripides’ original texts, Agamemnon surprisingly decides to pull a final trick on this plan, replacing his daughter Iphigenia with — you guessed it — a sacred deer. Applying this ancient story to Lanthimos’ work feels like enough of a 1:1 translation to start. Steven is Agamemnon. His sin of hubris translates into Steven’s reckless drinking and displays of wealth. Martin is both Artemis desiring the balance-restoring sacrifice, and the threat of Grecians killing Steven’s family if he doesn’t go through with it. But Lanthimos and Filippou aren’t interested in just adapting this Greek myth. In fact: They’re interested in correcting it. There’s no switch for a sacred deer in the final moments of Sacred Deer. No tricks, no weaseling out.


After spending nearly two hours agonizing over how to best the unwavering hand of fate, how to make unequal the ever-equalizing force of universal retribution, how to ignore the voices of “reason” around him (i.e. his daughter falling in love with Martin and begging to be the one sacrificed, his wife letting Martin escape from their impromptu torture basement), Steven gives in to as pure a fate as he can muster. Namely, he puts on a damn hat and spins in a damn circle to decide who he’ll kill. That’s about as random, as meaningfully meaningless, as admitting subservience to controllers beyond our control as you can get. Artemis wins.

In several moments of the film, Steven’s family tries to reassert Steven as the man in charge, rather than Martin, to try and pivot to another method of escaping fate. Anna “logically” points out that killing one of the children is a better choice because they can have another. Bob cuts his own hair, placating Steven’s early-film grumblings that his hair is too long. Even in the face of an unblinking God, we humans will search for any Earthly source of relief telling us it’s okay to blink. From the first shot to its last, Lanthimos’ Killing of a Sacred Deer is here to remind us that the universe will come to collect, and its eyes are forever wide open.

Advertisement



Advertisement

Movies News

Review: SAMARITAN, A Sly Stallone Superhero Stumble

Published

on

By

Review: SAMARITAN, A Sly Stallone Superhero Stumble

Hitting the three-quarter-century mark usually means a retirement home, a nursing facility, or if you’re lucky to be blessed with relatively good health and savings to match, living in a gated community in Arizona or Florida.

For Sylvester Stallone, however, it means something else entirely: starring in the first superhero-centered film of his decades-long career in the much-delayed Samaritan. Unfortunately for Stallone and the audience on the other side of the screen, the derivative, turgid, forgettable results won’t get mentioned in a career retrospective, let alone among the ever-expanding list of must-see entries in a genre already well past its peak.

For Stallone, however, it’s better late than never when it involves the superhero genre. Maybe in getting a taste of the MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe) with his walk-on role in the Guardians of the Galaxy sequel several years ago, Stallone thought anything Marvel can do, I can do even better (or just as good in the nebulous definition of the word).

Advertisement

The property Stallone and his team found for him, Samaritan, a little-known graphic novel released by a small, almost negligible, publisher, certainly takes advantage of Stallone’s brute-force physicality and his often underrated talent for near-monosyllabic brooding (e.g., the Rambo series), but too often gives him to little do or say as the lone super-powered survivor, the so-called “Samaritan” of the title, of a lifelong rivalry with his brother, “Nemesis.” Two brothers entered a fire-ravaged building and while both were presumed dead, one brother did survive (Stallone’s Joe Smith, a garbageman by day, an appliance repairman by night).

In the Granite City of screenwriter Bragi F. Schut (Escape Room, Season of the Witch), the United States, and presumably the rest of the world, teeters on economic and political collapse, with a recession spiraling into a depression, steady gigs difficult, if not impossible, to obtain, and the city’s neighborhoods rocked by crime and violence. No one’s safe, not even 13-year-old Sam (Javon Walker), Joe’s neighbor.

When he’s not dodging bullies connected to a gang, he’s falling under the undue influence of Cyrus (Pilou Asbæk), a low-rent gang leader with an outsized ego and the conviction that he and only he can take on Nemesis’s mantle and along with that mantle, a hammer “forged in hate,” to orchestrate a Bane-like plan to plunge the city into chaos and become a wealthy power-broker in the process.

Schut’s woefully underwritten script takes a clumsy, haphazard approach to world-building, relying on a two-minute animated sequence to open Samaritan while a naive, worshipful Sam narrates Samaritan and Nemesis’s supposedly tragic, Cain and Abel-inspired backstory. Schut and director Julius Avery (Overlord) clumsily attempt to contrast Sam’s childish belief in messiah-like, superheroic saviors stepping in to save humanity from itself and its own worst excesses, but following that path leads to authoritarianism and fascism (ideas better, more thoroughly explored in Watchmen and The Boys).

While Sam continues to think otherwise, Stallone’s superhero, 25 years past his last, fatal encounter with his presumably deceased brother, obviously believes superheroes are the problem and not the solution (a somewhat reasonable position), but as Samaritan tracks Joe and Sam’s friendship, Sam giving Joe the son he never had, Joe giving Sam the father he lost to street violence well before the film’s opening scene, it gets closer and closer to embracing, if not outright endorsing Sam’s power fantasies, right through a literally and figuratively explosive ending. Might, as always, wins regardless of how righteous or justified the underlying action.

It’s what superhero audiences want, apparently, and what Samaritan uncritically delivers via a woefully under-rendered finale involving not just unconvincing CGI fire effects, but a videogame cut-scene quality Stallone in a late-film flashback sequence that’s meant to be subversively revelatory, but will instead lead to unintentional laughter for anyone who’s managed to sit the entirety of Samaritan’s one-hour and 40-minute running time.

Advertisement

Samaritan is now streaming worldwide on Prime Video.

Samaritan

Cast
  • Sylvester Stallone
  • Javon ‘Wanna’ Walton
  • Pilou Asbæk

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movies News

Matt Shakman Is In Talks To Direct ‘Fantastic Four’

Published

on

By

According to a new report, Wandavision’s Matt Shakman is in talks to direct the upcoming MCU project, Fantastic Four. Marvel Studios has been very hush-hush regarding Fantastic Four to the point where no official announcements have been made other than the film’s release date. No casting news or literally anything other than rumors has been released regarding the project. We know that Fantastic Four is slated for release on November 8th, 2024, and will be a part of Marvel’s Phase 6. There are also rumors that the cast of the new Fantastic Four will be announced at the D23 Expo on September 9th.

Fantastic Four is still over two years from release, and we assume we will hear more news about the project in the coming months. However, the idea of the Fantastic Four has already been introduced into the MCU. John Krasinski played Reed Richards aka Mr. Fantastic in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. The cameo was a huge deal for fans who have been waiting a long time for the Fantastic Four to enter the MCU. When Disney acquired Twenty Century Fox in 2019 we assumed that the Fox Marvel characters would eventually make their way into the MCU. It’s been 3 years and we already have had an X-Men and Fantastic Four cameo – even if they were from another universe.

Deadline is reporting that Wandavision’s Matt Shakman is in talks to direct Fantastic Four. Shakman served as the director for Wandavision and has had an extensive career. He directed two episodes of Game of Thrones and an episode of The Boys, and he had a long stint on It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia. There is nothing official yet, but Deadline’s sources say that Shakman is currently in talks for the job and things are headed in the right direction.

Advertisement

To be honest, I was a bit more excited when Jon Watts was set to direct. I’m sure Shakman is a good director, but Watts proved he could handle a tentpole superhero film with Spider-Man: Homecoming. Wandavision was good, but Watts’ style would have been perfect for Fantastic Four. The film is probably one of the most anticipated films in Marvel’s upcoming slate films and they need to find the best person they can to direct. Is that Matt Shakman? It could be, but whoever takes the job must realize that Marvel has a lot riding on this movie. The other Fantastic Four films were awful and fans deserve better. Hopefully, Marvel knocks it out of the park as they usually do. You can see for yourself when Fantastic Four hits theaters on November 8th, 2024.

Film Synopsis: One of Marvel’s most iconic families makes it to the big screen: the Fantastic Four.

Source: Deadline

Continue Reading

Movies News

Dan Aykroyd, Chevy Chase Star in ‘Zombie Town’ Mystery Teen Romancer (Exclusive)

Published

on

By

Dan Aykroyd and Chevy Chase have entered Zombie Town, a mystery teen romancer based on author R.L. Stine’s book of the same name.

The indie, now shooting in Ontario, also stars Henry Czerny and co-teen leads Marlon Kazadi and Madi Monroe. The ensemble cast includes Scott Thompson and Bruce McCulloch of the Canadian comedy show Kids in the Hall.

Canadian animator Peter Lepeniotis will direct Zombie Town. Stine’s kid’s book sees a quiet town upended when 12-year-old Mike and his friend, Karen, see a horror movie called Zombie Town and unexpectedly see the title characters leap off the screen and chase them through the theater.

Zombie Town will premiere in U.S. theaters before streaming on Hulu and then ABC Australia in 2023.

“We are delighted to bring the pages of R.L. Stine’s Zombie Town to the screen and equally thrilled to be working with such an exceptional cast and crew on this production. A three-time Nickelodeon Kids Choice Award winner with book sales of over $500 million, R.L. Stine has a phenomenal track record of crafting stories that engage and entertain audiences,” John Gillespie, Trimuse Entertainment founder and executive producer, said in a statement.

Advertisement

Executive producers are Trimuse Entertainment, Toonz Media Group, Lookout Entertainment, Viva Pictures and Sons of Anarchy actor Kim Coates.  

Paco Alvarez and Mark Holdom of Trimuse negotiated the deal to acquire the rights to Stine’s Zombie Town book.

Continue Reading

Trending