Connect with us

Movies News

Knives Out Ending Explained: The Donut Hole Inside the Donut Hole

Published

on

Knives Out Ending Explained: The Donut Hole Inside the Donut Hole

Editor’s note: The following contains spoilers for Knives Out

I spoke in the car about the hole at the center of this donut. And yes, what you and Harlan did that fateful night seems at first glance to fill that hole perfectly. A donut hole in the donut’s hole. But we must look a little closer. And when we do, we see that the donut hole has a hole in its center — it is not a donut hole at all but a smaller donut with its own hole, and our donut is not a hole at all!

Leave it to Rian Johnson to take something consistently sweet like a donut or a whodunit and twist it into something that’s brand new, inventively clever, and still tastes and feels like said donut or whodunit murder mystery. The filmmaker’s 2019 murder mystery Knives Out might be that year’s most rewatchable film, a jam-packed ride of smart entertainment full of perfect actors performing a perfect script lensed perfectly. So, I thought I’d help dunk us all into the multiple donuts at the hole of this impeccable picture and its impeccable ending.

Advertisement

RELATED: Madelyn Cline Describes Filming ‘Knives Out 2’ as “Terrifying” But “Also Incredible”

Harlan Thrombey (Christopher Plummer) is dead. We know this from the first scene on. His throat is damn slit, and his blood is all over the damn sofa. Johnson does not pull any such “he was alive the whole time!” plot twist trickery in the final moments. For about half of the running time, like any other whodunit, the central question of the mystery novelist patriarch is indeed as simple as: “Whom has done this?” There are plenty of star-studded suspects in the form of Thrombey’s family (Jamie Lee Curtis, Don Johnson, Michael Shannon, Chris Evans, Toni Collette), and plenty of juicy motives for each of them (lack of respect, lack of financial support, discovery of infidelity). There’s Harlan’s greatest ally: his nurse Marta (Ana de Armas), a woman who is so pure of heart she literally vomits any time she tries to lie. And there is, of course, a blissfully eccentric detective: Benoit Blanc (Daniel Craig having the time of his life), a Southern-fried private investigator who’s here to sort through the truth (or find the “donut hole,” as he’s fond of saying) and answer the simple question of “whom has done this?”


Until, around halfway through the picture, Johnson pulls the rug out from under us and tells us exactly whom has done this. It was Marta. We are shown this explicitly. It was an accidental death, yes, but Marta is the person who accidentally injected Harlan with an overdose of morphine instead of the actual medicine he needed. Utilizing beyond-clever flashback editing and camera framing, unreliable narration, and the revelation of why Harlan’s throat appeared very slit, Johnson shows us how he grifted us, how he pulled the rug under the seemingly simple question of “whom has done this” to ask like eighteen more complicated ones. And then, back in the present tense, we watch Marta “work with” Blanc to cover up her tracks resolutely, in accordance with Harlan’s final wishes (he really and truly loved her)! What an entertaining friggin’ puzzle this movie is!


Advertisement

As the narrative barrels forward, including the surprise revelation that Harlan left everything in his estate, including the Thrombey house, to Marta (making her a primary suspect and new target of vitriol of the Thrombey family), she makes an escape thanks to an unlikely new ally: Ransom Thrombey (Evans and a beautiful sweater), the no-good black sheep of the family who’s disregarded as an opportunistic, greedy meanie. Offering his sympathies as the outsider of the Thrombey family, he gets Marta to spill the beans (thankfully not literally) about the actual truth. And the two decide to undergo a shaky alliance of sorts, Ransom offering increasingly aggressive tactics to keep her tracks covered, even as more chaos, destruction, and even the emaciated body of a would-be blackmailer (Fran, the Thrombey housekeeper played by Edi Patterson) piles up around them. Can they get away with it? Should they? How can the pure-hearted Marta keep this all a secret from Blanc?


And then… the actual ending occurs. And Johnson carefully places a rug back under our feet as he indulges in one of the greatest tropes of the whodunit: The eccentric detective eccentrically describing the truth behind the case. The donut hole at the center of the donut hole, if you will. We watch as Blanc explains carefully — well, maybe not “carefully” but certainly “colorfully” — the truth behind this twisted collection of raw dough: Ransom, whom we thought to be Marta’s newfound ally, is the only person in the room guilty of a crime.

When Ransom found out who was gonna get all the goodies from Harlan’s will, he purposefully switched Marta’s two medicine vial labels to ensure an overdose would happen and stole an antidote to boot. But Marta, ever the capable and pure-hearted worker and friend, knew innately what the correct vial was, picking it based not on the label but on the subtle difference and detection in appearance and feel. Which means that she did not kill Harlan Thrombey. She gave him the exact correct dosage. If only both parties in that room knew, Harlan wouldn’t have slit his throat to protect her, and he would still be alive.


Ransom himself hired Blanc to find the truth of Marta’s “murder.” When Fran discovered this scheme, peeping Ransom hiding some evidence, she’s the one who sent a blackmail note to Ransom, and he forwarded it to Marta implicating Fran. Then, he overdosed Fran with the deadly morphine, leaving her body to be discovered by Marta, hoping Blanc would pin her on that murder as well! Ransom, of course, denies this all: until Marta gets a call from the hospital saying that Fran is alive and well, in fact, spilling the beans on Ransom’s dastardly doings. And then, Johnson indulges in another lovely trope: The villain revealing his plan and vowing revenge! Yes, Ransom did all of these things, and he’d do them again!

Advertisement

And then… Marta does spill the beans literally on Ransom. She pukes all over him, revealing that she lied. The hospital call didn’t say Fran was going to recover and confess — it said that Fran had died. Ransom’s confession was thus of an actual murder of Fran. And Ransom, figuring “why not go two for two?”, grabs a knife from Harlan’s knife chair (knives out, baby!) and hurtles toward Marta!

Now, if we’ve been paying attention, we already know this won’t work. And we already know Ransom has been the bad guy the entire time. Harlan Thrombey told Marta, and us, explicitly, right before the scene where Johnson “told us explicitly” that Marta had killed him. In discussing the nature of games (Harlan loved playing Go with Marta), Harlan says this about Ransom as a player:

Ransom. Jesus, Ransom. Oh, there’s so much of me in that kid. Confident, stupid, I don’t know, protected. Playing life like a game without consequence, until you can’t tell the difference between a stage prop and a real knife. I don’t fear death. But, oh, God, I’d like to fix some of this before I go. Close the book with a flourish. I guess we’ll see. Hm?

And then, we see. Ransom’s knife is, of course, a stage prop, not real. It retracts within itself the moment it hits Marta’s pure heart, revealing itself with a flourish as nothing more than a toy. Marta is the only one who wasn’t ever playing any game. All she navigated was the present tense of what she believed to be the truth in front of her, the consequences of actions both given their proper respects and never run away from. Ransom, conversely, is introduced from moment one as a person who runs away from every consequence, who does nothing but play games to get out of the actual truth. The only way to fix this broken reality, to give Marta’s purity its proper path, was to tell the truth about Ransom’s horrible games. As soon as that truth comes out, the games are over. Marta stands upon the Thrombey’s old mansion, an ode to secrets and lies. With objective clarity, her coffee mug reveals the new stasis: Her house, her rules, her coffee. She deserves them all and more.

Advertisement

And then we realize, truly and sincerely: It was about “whom has done this” the whole time! Johnson — please send new rugs to my house, because I am tired of you pulling them from under me over and over.

Whilst you stir on these revelations, a sequel titled Knives Out 2 is on its way!


Advertisement

Movies News

Review: SAMARITAN, A Sly Stallone Superhero Stumble

Published

on

By

Review: SAMARITAN, A Sly Stallone Superhero Stumble

Hitting the three-quarter-century mark usually means a retirement home, a nursing facility, or if you’re lucky to be blessed with relatively good health and savings to match, living in a gated community in Arizona or Florida.

For Sylvester Stallone, however, it means something else entirely: starring in the first superhero-centered film of his decades-long career in the much-delayed Samaritan. Unfortunately for Stallone and the audience on the other side of the screen, the derivative, turgid, forgettable results won’t get mentioned in a career retrospective, let alone among the ever-expanding list of must-see entries in a genre already well past its peak.

For Stallone, however, it’s better late than never when it involves the superhero genre. Maybe in getting a taste of the MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe) with his walk-on role in the Guardians of the Galaxy sequel several years ago, Stallone thought anything Marvel can do, I can do even better (or just as good in the nebulous definition of the word).

Advertisement

The property Stallone and his team found for him, Samaritan, a little-known graphic novel released by a small, almost negligible, publisher, certainly takes advantage of Stallone’s brute-force physicality and his often underrated talent for near-monosyllabic brooding (e.g., the Rambo series), but too often gives him to little do or say as the lone super-powered survivor, the so-called “Samaritan” of the title, of a lifelong rivalry with his brother, “Nemesis.” Two brothers entered a fire-ravaged building and while both were presumed dead, one brother did survive (Stallone’s Joe Smith, a garbageman by day, an appliance repairman by night).

In the Granite City of screenwriter Bragi F. Schut (Escape Room, Season of the Witch), the United States, and presumably the rest of the world, teeters on economic and political collapse, with a recession spiraling into a depression, steady gigs difficult, if not impossible, to obtain, and the city’s neighborhoods rocked by crime and violence. No one’s safe, not even 13-year-old Sam (Javon Walker), Joe’s neighbor.

When he’s not dodging bullies connected to a gang, he’s falling under the undue influence of Cyrus (Pilou Asbæk), a low-rent gang leader with an outsized ego and the conviction that he and only he can take on Nemesis’s mantle and along with that mantle, a hammer “forged in hate,” to orchestrate a Bane-like plan to plunge the city into chaos and become a wealthy power-broker in the process.

Schut’s woefully underwritten script takes a clumsy, haphazard approach to world-building, relying on a two-minute animated sequence to open Samaritan while a naive, worshipful Sam narrates Samaritan and Nemesis’s supposedly tragic, Cain and Abel-inspired backstory. Schut and director Julius Avery (Overlord) clumsily attempt to contrast Sam’s childish belief in messiah-like, superheroic saviors stepping in to save humanity from itself and its own worst excesses, but following that path leads to authoritarianism and fascism (ideas better, more thoroughly explored in Watchmen and The Boys).

While Sam continues to think otherwise, Stallone’s superhero, 25 years past his last, fatal encounter with his presumably deceased brother, obviously believes superheroes are the problem and not the solution (a somewhat reasonable position), but as Samaritan tracks Joe and Sam’s friendship, Sam giving Joe the son he never had, Joe giving Sam the father he lost to street violence well before the film’s opening scene, it gets closer and closer to embracing, if not outright endorsing Sam’s power fantasies, right through a literally and figuratively explosive ending. Might, as always, wins regardless of how righteous or justified the underlying action.

It’s what superhero audiences want, apparently, and what Samaritan uncritically delivers via a woefully under-rendered finale involving not just unconvincing CGI fire effects, but a videogame cut-scene quality Stallone in a late-film flashback sequence that’s meant to be subversively revelatory, but will instead lead to unintentional laughter for anyone who’s managed to sit the entirety of Samaritan’s one-hour and 40-minute running time.

Advertisement

Samaritan is now streaming worldwide on Prime Video.

Samaritan

Cast
  • Sylvester Stallone
  • Javon ‘Wanna’ Walton
  • Pilou Asbæk

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movies News

Matt Shakman Is In Talks To Direct ‘Fantastic Four’

Published

on

By

According to a new report, Wandavision’s Matt Shakman is in talks to direct the upcoming MCU project, Fantastic Four. Marvel Studios has been very hush-hush regarding Fantastic Four to the point where no official announcements have been made other than the film’s release date. No casting news or literally anything other than rumors has been released regarding the project. We know that Fantastic Four is slated for release on November 8th, 2024, and will be a part of Marvel’s Phase 6. There are also rumors that the cast of the new Fantastic Four will be announced at the D23 Expo on September 9th.

Fantastic Four is still over two years from release, and we assume we will hear more news about the project in the coming months. However, the idea of the Fantastic Four has already been introduced into the MCU. John Krasinski played Reed Richards aka Mr. Fantastic in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. The cameo was a huge deal for fans who have been waiting a long time for the Fantastic Four to enter the MCU. When Disney acquired Twenty Century Fox in 2019 we assumed that the Fox Marvel characters would eventually make their way into the MCU. It’s been 3 years and we already have had an X-Men and Fantastic Four cameo – even if they were from another universe.

Deadline is reporting that Wandavision’s Matt Shakman is in talks to direct Fantastic Four. Shakman served as the director for Wandavision and has had an extensive career. He directed two episodes of Game of Thrones and an episode of The Boys, and he had a long stint on It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia. There is nothing official yet, but Deadline’s sources say that Shakman is currently in talks for the job and things are headed in the right direction.

Advertisement

To be honest, I was a bit more excited when Jon Watts was set to direct. I’m sure Shakman is a good director, but Watts proved he could handle a tentpole superhero film with Spider-Man: Homecoming. Wandavision was good, but Watts’ style would have been perfect for Fantastic Four. The film is probably one of the most anticipated films in Marvel’s upcoming slate films and they need to find the best person they can to direct. Is that Matt Shakman? It could be, but whoever takes the job must realize that Marvel has a lot riding on this movie. The other Fantastic Four films were awful and fans deserve better. Hopefully, Marvel knocks it out of the park as they usually do. You can see for yourself when Fantastic Four hits theaters on November 8th, 2024.

Film Synopsis: One of Marvel’s most iconic families makes it to the big screen: the Fantastic Four.

Source: Deadline

Continue Reading

Movies News

Dan Aykroyd, Chevy Chase Star in ‘Zombie Town’ Mystery Teen Romancer (Exclusive)

Published

on

By

Dan Aykroyd and Chevy Chase have entered Zombie Town, a mystery teen romancer based on author R.L. Stine’s book of the same name.

The indie, now shooting in Ontario, also stars Henry Czerny and co-teen leads Marlon Kazadi and Madi Monroe. The ensemble cast includes Scott Thompson and Bruce McCulloch of the Canadian comedy show Kids in the Hall.

Canadian animator Peter Lepeniotis will direct Zombie Town. Stine’s kid’s book sees a quiet town upended when 12-year-old Mike and his friend, Karen, see a horror movie called Zombie Town and unexpectedly see the title characters leap off the screen and chase them through the theater.

Zombie Town will premiere in U.S. theaters before streaming on Hulu and then ABC Australia in 2023.

“We are delighted to bring the pages of R.L. Stine’s Zombie Town to the screen and equally thrilled to be working with such an exceptional cast and crew on this production. A three-time Nickelodeon Kids Choice Award winner with book sales of over $500 million, R.L. Stine has a phenomenal track record of crafting stories that engage and entertain audiences,” John Gillespie, Trimuse Entertainment founder and executive producer, said in a statement.

Advertisement

Executive producers are Trimuse Entertainment, Toonz Media Group, Lookout Entertainment, Viva Pictures and Sons of Anarchy actor Kim Coates.  

Paco Alvarez and Mark Holdom of Trimuse negotiated the deal to acquire the rights to Stine’s Zombie Town book.

Continue Reading

Trending