Connect with us

Movies News

Jon Stewart’s Harry Potter Controversy Explained

Published

on

Jon Stewart’s Harry Potter Controversy Explained

Jon Stewart’s Harry Potter controversy stems from the interpretations of comments that the comedian made during a December 2021 episode of The Problem with Jon Stewart podcast. Following the episode, digital media outlets such as Variety and Newsweek claimed that Stewart accused the already controversial Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling of being anti-semitic because of how goblins are depicted in the highly popular fantasy series. However, there is actually much more to the story.

In the world of viral media, Jon Stewart’s Harry Potter controversy is the perfect storm. Ever since Stewart took over hosting duties at The Daily Show in 1999, his name has been synonymous with political and news satire. At the same time, some other critics have separately accused the goblins in Harry Potter of being anti-semitic, due to their on-screen portrayal. This, in turn, follows previous accusations of transphobia against acclaimed fantasy author Rowling, tarnishing the series’ legacy for some fans.

SCREENRANT VIDEO OF THE DAY

Related: Harry Potter: How Hogwarts & Its Professors Are Funded

Advertisement

Jon Stewart’s Harry Potter controversy is essentially a result of all these factors coming together to create something viral. Adding fuel to the fire is the fact that J.K. Rowling was notably missing from the Harry Potter reunion special, which was released early in 2022. Here’s a breakdown of every crucial factor regarding the controversy.

Jon Stewart’s Harry Potter Controversy Explained

In December 16, 2021, Stewart discussed the evolution of the Jewish bar mitzvah with writers Henrik Blix and Jay Jurden on his podcast The Problem with Jon Stewart. According to Stewart, bar mitzvahs used to be simple and private events, until they blew up to become “Gatsby-esque.” In the context of political satire, Stewart explains how modern and increasingly ostentatious bar mitzvahs have come to carry the message, “The Jews have arrived. And we are going to dazzle you with the access.” Jurden then chimes in by asking Stewart which chapter of Harry Potter “The Jews have arrived” can be found in. This prompts Stewart to go off on a comedic rant, comparing the goblins that run the underground bank in Harry Potter to the caricatures of Jews found within anti-semitic literature. Stewart is known for taking comedy seriously, and this type of edgy material is well within his purview, as established during his Daily Show tenure.


While doing a satirical impression of J.K. Rowling in the context of a comedic podcast conversation, Stewart points to an imaginary copy of the fabricated anti-semitic text “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” and says, “Can we get these guys to run our bank?” Following this comedy bit in The Problem with Jon Stewart, in the morning of January 4, Newsweek released a story titled “Jon Stewart Accuses J.K. Rowling of Antisemitism in ‘Harry Potter’.” The story immediately went viral, likely propped up by the fact that the recent Harry Potter reunion didn’t include J.K. Rowling, which itself was a viral story. In response, on January 6, Stewart released a video on his Twitter account with the caption, “Newsweek et al, may eat my ass.” In the video, Stewart clarifies that the controversial conversation in question was purely comedic, and that if any political context is to be drawn from the bit, it is that “some tropes are so embedded in society that they are basically invisible, even in a considered process like movie-making.” Here’s more of what Stewart said:


“I do not think J.K. Rowling is anti-semitic. I did not accuse her of being anti-semitic. I do not think that the Harry Potter movies are anti-semitic. I really love the Harry Potter movies, probably too much for a gentleman of my considerable age. I would just like to say that none of that is true, and that a reasonable person could not have looked at that conversation and not found it lighthearted.”

Related: Harry Potter: Mrs. Norris Is A Maledictus Like Nagini – Theory Explained

Advertisement

Why Some People Say Harry Potter’s Goblins Are Anti-Semitic

The depiction of goblins in Harry Potter seems to mirror how Jewish people were caricatured in anti-semitic propaganda from the late 1800s to the early 1900s. This applies not just to the goblins’ hook-nosed faces and hunched bodies, but also to their actions across the Harry Potter series. Amid the threatening events in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire and the convoluted plot of the war in Deathly Hallows, for instance, the goblins were not only more concerned with their money over people’s lives, they even handled finances for the Death Eaters. Moreover, Hagrid, who is known for seeing the good in all types of creatures, offers this warning early in the series: “They’re goblins, Harry. Clever as they come, goblins, but not the most friendly of beasts.” These apparent parallels to the historically bigoted depictions of Jewish people explain why the Harry Potter controversy carries so much weight.


Responses To The Harry Potter Anti-Semitism Controversy

On the other hand, echoing Jon Stewart’s comments on the matter, some argue that the similarity between Harry Potter‘s goblins and Jews isn’t an indication that J.K. Rowling is anti-semitic, but rather a symptom of a deeper cultural problem. Indeed, many of the elements in Harry Potter are derived from long-standing fantasy tropes. These tropes are often cultural products from a time in which anti-semitism was more overtly prevalent. J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings, on which many of the existing tropes in Harry Potter and many other popular fantasy franchises can be traced, is itself an interpretation of pre-existing literature and propaganda, many of which were anti-semitic. In short, the other side of the argument postulates that Rowling didn’t intend for goblins to be directly similar to racist caricatures of Jews. Rather, Harry Potter‘s goblins are a product of how anti-semitism has become so deeply embedded into modern culture that it’s become practically invisible, even to academically-discerning best-selling authors who have a history of supporting Jewish communities. Curiously, while hook-nosed and hunched caricatures that can be traced back to anti-semitic propaganda are present in a great number of modern media, it’s notable that Harry Potter‘s Lord Voldemort himself didn’t even have a nose, and has been described by Rowling as partly inspired by Adolf Hitler.


On January 5, after the podcast episode but prior to Stewart’s response, The Times of Israel released a story about how Jewish figures came to Rowling’s defense “after comedian Jon Stewart alleged that the author’s goblin characters were clearly antisemitic.” British Jewish comedian David Baddiel, who is known for being vocal against anti-semitism, said this: “The goblins in Harry Potter need to be seen not in a simplistic #teamRowling vs #antiteamRowling way but in a many-centuries long, deeply subconsciously embedded cultural context.”

More: Harry Potter’s Reunion Secretly Revealed Why A Sequel Is So Unlikely

Advertisement



About The Author

Advertisement

Movies News

Review: SAMARITAN, A Sly Stallone Superhero Stumble

Published

on

By

Review: SAMARITAN, A Sly Stallone Superhero Stumble

Hitting the three-quarter-century mark usually means a retirement home, a nursing facility, or if you’re lucky to be blessed with relatively good health and savings to match, living in a gated community in Arizona or Florida.

For Sylvester Stallone, however, it means something else entirely: starring in the first superhero-centered film of his decades-long career in the much-delayed Samaritan. Unfortunately for Stallone and the audience on the other side of the screen, the derivative, turgid, forgettable results won’t get mentioned in a career retrospective, let alone among the ever-expanding list of must-see entries in a genre already well past its peak.

For Stallone, however, it’s better late than never when it involves the superhero genre. Maybe in getting a taste of the MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe) with his walk-on role in the Guardians of the Galaxy sequel several years ago, Stallone thought anything Marvel can do, I can do even better (or just as good in the nebulous definition of the word).

Advertisement

The property Stallone and his team found for him, Samaritan, a little-known graphic novel released by a small, almost negligible, publisher, certainly takes advantage of Stallone’s brute-force physicality and his often underrated talent for near-monosyllabic brooding (e.g., the Rambo series), but too often gives him to little do or say as the lone super-powered survivor, the so-called “Samaritan” of the title, of a lifelong rivalry with his brother, “Nemesis.” Two brothers entered a fire-ravaged building and while both were presumed dead, one brother did survive (Stallone’s Joe Smith, a garbageman by day, an appliance repairman by night).

In the Granite City of screenwriter Bragi F. Schut (Escape Room, Season of the Witch), the United States, and presumably the rest of the world, teeters on economic and political collapse, with a recession spiraling into a depression, steady gigs difficult, if not impossible, to obtain, and the city’s neighborhoods rocked by crime and violence. No one’s safe, not even 13-year-old Sam (Javon Walker), Joe’s neighbor.

When he’s not dodging bullies connected to a gang, he’s falling under the undue influence of Cyrus (Pilou Asbæk), a low-rent gang leader with an outsized ego and the conviction that he and only he can take on Nemesis’s mantle and along with that mantle, a hammer “forged in hate,” to orchestrate a Bane-like plan to plunge the city into chaos and become a wealthy power-broker in the process.

Schut’s woefully underwritten script takes a clumsy, haphazard approach to world-building, relying on a two-minute animated sequence to open Samaritan while a naive, worshipful Sam narrates Samaritan and Nemesis’s supposedly tragic, Cain and Abel-inspired backstory. Schut and director Julius Avery (Overlord) clumsily attempt to contrast Sam’s childish belief in messiah-like, superheroic saviors stepping in to save humanity from itself and its own worst excesses, but following that path leads to authoritarianism and fascism (ideas better, more thoroughly explored in Watchmen and The Boys).

While Sam continues to think otherwise, Stallone’s superhero, 25 years past his last, fatal encounter with his presumably deceased brother, obviously believes superheroes are the problem and not the solution (a somewhat reasonable position), but as Samaritan tracks Joe and Sam’s friendship, Sam giving Joe the son he never had, Joe giving Sam the father he lost to street violence well before the film’s opening scene, it gets closer and closer to embracing, if not outright endorsing Sam’s power fantasies, right through a literally and figuratively explosive ending. Might, as always, wins regardless of how righteous or justified the underlying action.

It’s what superhero audiences want, apparently, and what Samaritan uncritically delivers via a woefully under-rendered finale involving not just unconvincing CGI fire effects, but a videogame cut-scene quality Stallone in a late-film flashback sequence that’s meant to be subversively revelatory, but will instead lead to unintentional laughter for anyone who’s managed to sit the entirety of Samaritan’s one-hour and 40-minute running time.

Advertisement

Samaritan is now streaming worldwide on Prime Video.

Samaritan

Cast
  • Sylvester Stallone
  • Javon ‘Wanna’ Walton
  • Pilou Asbæk

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movies News

Matt Shakman Is In Talks To Direct ‘Fantastic Four’

Published

on

By

According to a new report, Wandavision’s Matt Shakman is in talks to direct the upcoming MCU project, Fantastic Four. Marvel Studios has been very hush-hush regarding Fantastic Four to the point where no official announcements have been made other than the film’s release date. No casting news or literally anything other than rumors has been released regarding the project. We know that Fantastic Four is slated for release on November 8th, 2024, and will be a part of Marvel’s Phase 6. There are also rumors that the cast of the new Fantastic Four will be announced at the D23 Expo on September 9th.

Fantastic Four is still over two years from release, and we assume we will hear more news about the project in the coming months. However, the idea of the Fantastic Four has already been introduced into the MCU. John Krasinski played Reed Richards aka Mr. Fantastic in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. The cameo was a huge deal for fans who have been waiting a long time for the Fantastic Four to enter the MCU. When Disney acquired Twenty Century Fox in 2019 we assumed that the Fox Marvel characters would eventually make their way into the MCU. It’s been 3 years and we already have had an X-Men and Fantastic Four cameo – even if they were from another universe.

Deadline is reporting that Wandavision’s Matt Shakman is in talks to direct Fantastic Four. Shakman served as the director for Wandavision and has had an extensive career. He directed two episodes of Game of Thrones and an episode of The Boys, and he had a long stint on It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia. There is nothing official yet, but Deadline’s sources say that Shakman is currently in talks for the job and things are headed in the right direction.

Advertisement

To be honest, I was a bit more excited when Jon Watts was set to direct. I’m sure Shakman is a good director, but Watts proved he could handle a tentpole superhero film with Spider-Man: Homecoming. Wandavision was good, but Watts’ style would have been perfect for Fantastic Four. The film is probably one of the most anticipated films in Marvel’s upcoming slate films and they need to find the best person they can to direct. Is that Matt Shakman? It could be, but whoever takes the job must realize that Marvel has a lot riding on this movie. The other Fantastic Four films were awful and fans deserve better. Hopefully, Marvel knocks it out of the park as they usually do. You can see for yourself when Fantastic Four hits theaters on November 8th, 2024.

Film Synopsis: One of Marvel’s most iconic families makes it to the big screen: the Fantastic Four.

Source: Deadline

Continue Reading

Movies News

Dan Aykroyd, Chevy Chase Star in ‘Zombie Town’ Mystery Teen Romancer (Exclusive)

Published

on

By

Dan Aykroyd and Chevy Chase have entered Zombie Town, a mystery teen romancer based on author R.L. Stine’s book of the same name.

The indie, now shooting in Ontario, also stars Henry Czerny and co-teen leads Marlon Kazadi and Madi Monroe. The ensemble cast includes Scott Thompson and Bruce McCulloch of the Canadian comedy show Kids in the Hall.

Canadian animator Peter Lepeniotis will direct Zombie Town. Stine’s kid’s book sees a quiet town upended when 12-year-old Mike and his friend, Karen, see a horror movie called Zombie Town and unexpectedly see the title characters leap off the screen and chase them through the theater.

Zombie Town will premiere in U.S. theaters before streaming on Hulu and then ABC Australia in 2023.

“We are delighted to bring the pages of R.L. Stine’s Zombie Town to the screen and equally thrilled to be working with such an exceptional cast and crew on this production. A three-time Nickelodeon Kids Choice Award winner with book sales of over $500 million, R.L. Stine has a phenomenal track record of crafting stories that engage and entertain audiences,” John Gillespie, Trimuse Entertainment founder and executive producer, said in a statement.

Advertisement

Executive producers are Trimuse Entertainment, Toonz Media Group, Lookout Entertainment, Viva Pictures and Sons of Anarchy actor Kim Coates.  

Paco Alvarez and Mark Holdom of Trimuse negotiated the deal to acquire the rights to Stine’s Zombie Town book.

Continue Reading

Trending