Connect with us

Movies News

Front Row’s Gianluca Chakra on How Arabic Remake of ‘Perfect Strangers’ “Dared to Break the Mold”

Published

on

Front Row’s Gianluca Chakra on How Arabic Remake of ‘Perfect Strangers’ “Dared to Break the Mold”

After almost 20 years as the Middle East’s flag bearer for indie film distribution, bringing prestige festival fare and award-winning features to regional cinemas and TVs, Dubai-based banner Front Row Filmed Entertainment recently hit the headlines with its debut production.

The Arabic-language remake of Italian hit Perfect Strangers — the launch film from a first-look deal the company signed with Netflix — was always going to cause a stir thanks to certain themes still considered taboo, including homosexuality, but few were expecting the controversy that would follow. Within days, it was labeled part of a plot to disrupt Arab society, with prominent conservatives in Egypt attacking its actors, threatening lawsuits and even raising the film in Parliament. But perhaps more powerfully came the response from the other side, with thousands — including vast swathes of the creative community — praising the film and issuing statements in support of its cast and artistic freedom. And amid all the noise, Perfect Strangers quickly leapt to the top of Netflix’s charts in every Middle Eastern territory — including Saudi Arabia — becoming one of its best-performing non-English films globally.

Speaking to The Hollywood Reporter, Front Row managing director Gianluca Chakra — who launched the company with his late father Michel Chakra in 2003 — discusses how Perfect Strangers underlines his recent push towards making quality Arabic content, explains why the company teamed with Netflix on its first-ever production and describes the pleasant surprise that was releasing Mads Mikkelsen’s boozy Oscar-winner Another Round in a country where alcohol is strictly forbidden.

Indie film distributors have had a pretty tough few years. How has it been for Front Row in the Middle East? 

Outside of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, nothing is really working theatrically. Before, it was insane, like this novelty factor, but now you’re starting to realize that you can target films there, whereas in the UAE you can’t, and there’s a habit of screwing over smaller titles. The UAE is so desperate to recover the losses they had throughout the lockdown and through that limited seating phase that when a Spider-Man comes out, they’ll just give every screen to Spider-Man and fuck everything else.

Advertisement

Cinemas are currently offering a pretty easy program tailored to the lowest common denominator that simply gets the audience only used to event films. This clearly leaves a massive gap in the market that will be filled by distributors who will undoubtedly go after different premium sources of revenue, something I think will eventually only contribute to the demise of the theatrical window. They’re shooting themselves in the foot!

Are there censorship challenges with your films in Saudi? 

You actually get some nice surprise hits, and it can be quite significant. Saudi Arabia obviously wants to change the perception of what it was. So, for example, we had Another Round and thought, “That’s a no-go.” But on the contrary, they were like, “No, we’ve been waiting for this film.” They’re taking it step by step, but they were quite excited to see the film and let it pass. So we were sensible enough to go for a pic of the dinner party on the poster and not have Mads Mikkelsen drinking from a champagne bottle. And slowly they’re opening up and trying to push the envelope, and after I went there, you see that they are welcoming the change and want to be more progressive. So it’s all very encouraging on that front, and they’ll accept films you think would never pass.

So are the traditional films Front Row would release being squeezed out elsewhere by the tentpoles? 

Right now, throughout all of the Middle East, there’s this trend where obviously the tentpole titles work, but (there is) also a high demand for local content, and that’s key. And because they’re not on the streaming sites, they’ll do well in cinemas, at times on a par with the Batmans and the Spider-Mans. But as we’ve found out, the audience is not yet that sophisticated. So they’ll still go for their slapstick comedy. But if there’s a lot more demand for local content, then I’m sure down the line then the audience is going to be a lot more sophisticated.

That said, while local content is indeed needed to keep people coming to cinemas, exhibitors in Saudi Arabia are offering disadvantageous terms for local movies that inexplicably prioritize mainly Hindi films, giving them better terms. They do milk Arabic language films, which often do more than any others, but I find this truly unfair. They all mention that they should encourage Arab cinema, but then they offer these unfair terms. It needs to change.

Advertisement

Was this demand for local content the thinking behind Front Row’s move into production a few years ago?

Yeah, that was the thought process, and also the thought process of thinking that, down the line, we want to have the liberty of choosing whether we should go theatrical on some titles or go straight to streamers. It truly depends. Obviously, when it comes to global streamers you are creating a demand of Arab films internationally.

So why then did you decide to launch your first production, Perfect Strangers, on Netflix?

We’ve collaborated a lot over the last few years and helped curate their regional film selections, like the Palestinian, Egyptian and Lebanese ones. Having the whole Palestinian collection on Netflix was a big deal, which I didn’t realize at the time. But it was so significant for the Arab world. From the comments we have read, just the fact that it was called the Palestinian collection – the social media reaction was insane as many saw this as a recognition of Palestine. When it came to Perfect Strangers, the Netflix team understood our vision and our need to present a different perspective in Arab/local cinema and became extremely supportive of the whole project. We just saw this as the perfect fit.  Honestly, they’ve been awesome — and it helped cement our relationship with them, eventually striking a first-look deal.

Would Perfect Strangers have even made it to cinemas? 

I think it would have passed the censors – literally, there aren’t any written rules over here for censorship when it comes to a film like Perfect Strangers. But when it exploded, I’m positive that two days later they would have removed it. It has happened before with other films, and we would have lost a shit ton of money.

Advertisement

Given its themes, Perfect Strangers was always going to spark a reaction in the Middle East. But has the size of the response — both good and bad and the fact it has topped Netflix’s charts across the region and beyond — helped underline this need for quality Arabic content?

I know a lot of people are now saying, “Hey, let’s create controversial content,” and I’m like, “That’s not the way it works!” But I do think that, unknowingly and I’m not saying this arrogantly, we’ve raised the bar. In the sense that you can do a commercial film with a high concept over here. I wasn’t thinking of this at the time. I just thought, “holy shit, why doesn’t anybody remake Perfect Strangers in Arabic”? It’s a universal subject. That was my original idea – I remember watching it in Italy and seeing people’s reactions outside of the theater, especially couples fighting, and thinking let’s do it, people need to talk about this stuff.

You’re also remaking the French hit The Intouchables. What’s behind this model of remaking international films? 

For us, the writing in the region is just not quite there yet. People tend to auto-censor themselves a lot out here, so they won’t consider writing something different just because people might get offended. So we thought let’s kick-start it with remakes, while also trying to look at and develop original material. Ideally, we want to make films that reflect the sort of films that we’re known for releasing and open people’s eyes. Over here, people will remember Perfect Strangers as the film that dared to break the mold.

Do you think the arrival of Disney+ and HBO Max in the region is going to drive the thirst for more local original content?

Yeah, and it’s great for everyone. It means that people are going to start wanting quality, and this is what they’re going to bet on. I honestly think it’s a great thing.

Advertisement

Do you see production become a sizeable proportion of Front Row’s business? Are you going to need to expand?

We’re actually separating the production side, but it’s definitely going to become a sizeable part of the business and we have already started expanding on that front. We now have a development team and have acquired a sizeable chunk of the boutique creative agency Operation Unicorn (that) will be handling original material that would reflect our brand. We’ve started now, and it’s great – luckily, we had our first hit. But we’re betting on that.

Movies News

Review: SAMARITAN, A Sly Stallone Superhero Stumble

Published

on

By

Review: SAMARITAN, A Sly Stallone Superhero Stumble

Hitting the three-quarter-century mark usually means a retirement home, a nursing facility, or if you’re lucky to be blessed with relatively good health and savings to match, living in a gated community in Arizona or Florida.

For Sylvester Stallone, however, it means something else entirely: starring in the first superhero-centered film of his decades-long career in the much-delayed Samaritan. Unfortunately for Stallone and the audience on the other side of the screen, the derivative, turgid, forgettable results won’t get mentioned in a career retrospective, let alone among the ever-expanding list of must-see entries in a genre already well past its peak.

For Stallone, however, it’s better late than never when it involves the superhero genre. Maybe in getting a taste of the MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe) with his walk-on role in the Guardians of the Galaxy sequel several years ago, Stallone thought anything Marvel can do, I can do even better (or just as good in the nebulous definition of the word).

Advertisement

The property Stallone and his team found for him, Samaritan, a little-known graphic novel released by a small, almost negligible, publisher, certainly takes advantage of Stallone’s brute-force physicality and his often underrated talent for near-monosyllabic brooding (e.g., the Rambo series), but too often gives him to little do or say as the lone super-powered survivor, the so-called “Samaritan” of the title, of a lifelong rivalry with his brother, “Nemesis.” Two brothers entered a fire-ravaged building and while both were presumed dead, one brother did survive (Stallone’s Joe Smith, a garbageman by day, an appliance repairman by night).

In the Granite City of screenwriter Bragi F. Schut (Escape Room, Season of the Witch), the United States, and presumably the rest of the world, teeters on economic and political collapse, with a recession spiraling into a depression, steady gigs difficult, if not impossible, to obtain, and the city’s neighborhoods rocked by crime and violence. No one’s safe, not even 13-year-old Sam (Javon Walker), Joe’s neighbor.

When he’s not dodging bullies connected to a gang, he’s falling under the undue influence of Cyrus (Pilou Asbæk), a low-rent gang leader with an outsized ego and the conviction that he and only he can take on Nemesis’s mantle and along with that mantle, a hammer “forged in hate,” to orchestrate a Bane-like plan to plunge the city into chaos and become a wealthy power-broker in the process.

Schut’s woefully underwritten script takes a clumsy, haphazard approach to world-building, relying on a two-minute animated sequence to open Samaritan while a naive, worshipful Sam narrates Samaritan and Nemesis’s supposedly tragic, Cain and Abel-inspired backstory. Schut and director Julius Avery (Overlord) clumsily attempt to contrast Sam’s childish belief in messiah-like, superheroic saviors stepping in to save humanity from itself and its own worst excesses, but following that path leads to authoritarianism and fascism (ideas better, more thoroughly explored in Watchmen and The Boys).

While Sam continues to think otherwise, Stallone’s superhero, 25 years past his last, fatal encounter with his presumably deceased brother, obviously believes superheroes are the problem and not the solution (a somewhat reasonable position), but as Samaritan tracks Joe and Sam’s friendship, Sam giving Joe the son he never had, Joe giving Sam the father he lost to street violence well before the film’s opening scene, it gets closer and closer to embracing, if not outright endorsing Sam’s power fantasies, right through a literally and figuratively explosive ending. Might, as always, wins regardless of how righteous or justified the underlying action.

It’s what superhero audiences want, apparently, and what Samaritan uncritically delivers via a woefully under-rendered finale involving not just unconvincing CGI fire effects, but a videogame cut-scene quality Stallone in a late-film flashback sequence that’s meant to be subversively revelatory, but will instead lead to unintentional laughter for anyone who’s managed to sit the entirety of Samaritan’s one-hour and 40-minute running time.

Advertisement

Samaritan is now streaming worldwide on Prime Video.

Samaritan

Cast
  • Sylvester Stallone
  • Javon ‘Wanna’ Walton
  • Pilou Asbæk

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movies News

Matt Shakman Is In Talks To Direct ‘Fantastic Four’

Published

on

By

According to a new report, Wandavision’s Matt Shakman is in talks to direct the upcoming MCU project, Fantastic Four. Marvel Studios has been very hush-hush regarding Fantastic Four to the point where no official announcements have been made other than the film’s release date. No casting news or literally anything other than rumors has been released regarding the project. We know that Fantastic Four is slated for release on November 8th, 2024, and will be a part of Marvel’s Phase 6. There are also rumors that the cast of the new Fantastic Four will be announced at the D23 Expo on September 9th.

Fantastic Four is still over two years from release, and we assume we will hear more news about the project in the coming months. However, the idea of the Fantastic Four has already been introduced into the MCU. John Krasinski played Reed Richards aka Mr. Fantastic in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. The cameo was a huge deal for fans who have been waiting a long time for the Fantastic Four to enter the MCU. When Disney acquired Twenty Century Fox in 2019 we assumed that the Fox Marvel characters would eventually make their way into the MCU. It’s been 3 years and we already have had an X-Men and Fantastic Four cameo – even if they were from another universe.

Deadline is reporting that Wandavision’s Matt Shakman is in talks to direct Fantastic Four. Shakman served as the director for Wandavision and has had an extensive career. He directed two episodes of Game of Thrones and an episode of The Boys, and he had a long stint on It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia. There is nothing official yet, but Deadline’s sources say that Shakman is currently in talks for the job and things are headed in the right direction.

Advertisement

To be honest, I was a bit more excited when Jon Watts was set to direct. I’m sure Shakman is a good director, but Watts proved he could handle a tentpole superhero film with Spider-Man: Homecoming. Wandavision was good, but Watts’ style would have been perfect for Fantastic Four. The film is probably one of the most anticipated films in Marvel’s upcoming slate films and they need to find the best person they can to direct. Is that Matt Shakman? It could be, but whoever takes the job must realize that Marvel has a lot riding on this movie. The other Fantastic Four films were awful and fans deserve better. Hopefully, Marvel knocks it out of the park as they usually do. You can see for yourself when Fantastic Four hits theaters on November 8th, 2024.

Film Synopsis: One of Marvel’s most iconic families makes it to the big screen: the Fantastic Four.

Source: Deadline

Continue Reading

Movies News

Dan Aykroyd, Chevy Chase Star in ‘Zombie Town’ Mystery Teen Romancer (Exclusive)

Published

on

By

Dan Aykroyd and Chevy Chase have entered Zombie Town, a mystery teen romancer based on author R.L. Stine’s book of the same name.

The indie, now shooting in Ontario, also stars Henry Czerny and co-teen leads Marlon Kazadi and Madi Monroe. The ensemble cast includes Scott Thompson and Bruce McCulloch of the Canadian comedy show Kids in the Hall.

Canadian animator Peter Lepeniotis will direct Zombie Town. Stine’s kid’s book sees a quiet town upended when 12-year-old Mike and his friend, Karen, see a horror movie called Zombie Town and unexpectedly see the title characters leap off the screen and chase them through the theater.

Zombie Town will premiere in U.S. theaters before streaming on Hulu and then ABC Australia in 2023.

“We are delighted to bring the pages of R.L. Stine’s Zombie Town to the screen and equally thrilled to be working with such an exceptional cast and crew on this production. A three-time Nickelodeon Kids Choice Award winner with book sales of over $500 million, R.L. Stine has a phenomenal track record of crafting stories that engage and entertain audiences,” John Gillespie, Trimuse Entertainment founder and executive producer, said in a statement.

Advertisement

Executive producers are Trimuse Entertainment, Toonz Media Group, Lookout Entertainment, Viva Pictures and Sons of Anarchy actor Kim Coates.  

Paco Alvarez and Mark Holdom of Trimuse negotiated the deal to acquire the rights to Stine’s Zombie Town book.

Continue Reading

Trending