Connect with us

Movies News

Edward Scissorhands: Tim Burton’s Most Vulnerable Outsider

Published

on

Edward Scissorhands: Tim Burton’s Most Vulnerable Outsider

It always seems unkind to artists that commentary can sometimes reduce their body of work down to a couple of unnuanced sound bites. Exhibit A among filmmakers for this issue might be Tim Burton. Even his recent or uneven films have more to them than the usual talking points of spirals, black and white, Johnny Depp, and misunderstood outsiders. Ironically, the latter theme encompasses this very problem, and it’s one Burton has never been shy in discussing.

The misfits of his movies have been a source of identification for viewers who’ve felt that sort of alienation from the world around them, but even among this collection of outcasts, there’s a range I don’t often see acknowledged. Just how much of a range becomes apparent when you compare other Burton protagonists to his most raw expression of this theme: Edward Scissorhands.

Advertisement

Count me among those many lonely filmgoers who found succor in Burton’s work growing up. Edward Scissorhands is as honest a picture of adolescence (and, frankly, the college years) as I’ve ever seen. To this day, if you ask me for my favorite film, I’ll almost always answer Edward Scissorhands. But it isn’t a film I came to easily. The first time I ever tried watching it, I think I got as far as the first flashback with Vincent Price before I shut it off. I had to shut it off. The movie, even in those first few scenes, was overwhelming.

Films had left their mark on me before but never induced such a swell of emotion that it seemed I might burst. There was no outlet for it; I couldn’t burst into tears or think of any drawing or writing that might exorcise the feeling; I just felt, and it was too much. No film before or since has hit as hard. The next two or three tries at watching Scissorhands went the same way, though I think I made it as far as the attempted burglary once. Ultimately, I had to skip ahead on the DVD to learn how the story turned out before I could manage watching it from beginning to end. The experience confounded me.

I was in my early teens when I first attempted to watch Scissorhands, just old enough to think of movies as a possible career path, and Tim Burton as a filmmaker of note. As teenage musicians often idolize and emulate rock stars, I idolized Burton through high school theater and film school. He remains the man behind my favorite musical, favorite take on Batman – and, as I’ve said, my favorite movie. But nothing else he directed was such a difficult and emotional watch, and it was hard to understand why. Even then, I could see the recurring theme of societal outcasts in his main characters (and the man himself mentioned it often enough in Mark Salisbury’s Burton on Burton, which I read and reread religiously). The rest of them were comparatively easy to engage with.


Advertisement

Jack Skellington never cut so deep with his midlife crisis that I had to shut the movie off. Burton’s well-meaning but scatterbrained interpretation of Batman was still as exciting and comfortable a watch as more conventional adaptations. Pee-Wee Herman and Beetlejuice were hilarious in their respective films, not heartbreaking. And the Bloom family, for all its dysfunction, was oddly comforting and accessible in Big Fish. What was it, then, that made Edward Scissorhands so raw?

RELATED: The Long Sleigh Ride of ‘The Nightmare Before Christmas’ to the Silver Screen

The answer, I think, is that Edward and his film are uniquely exposed and vulnerable as an expression of alienation. This is where broad stroke summaries of Burton’s misfits can mask the variety on offer. Many of his protagonists, for all their angst and detachment from society (chosen or imposed), have mitigating circumstances that Edward doesn’t have. Some of them benefit from being perfectly content with who they are.


Beetlejuice may want to gain corporeal existence through marriage, but he’s secure in his rotted, moss-covered, perverted skin. Pee-Wee seems to have no complaints about his lot in life; some of the people he encountered may not like him, but it’s no skin off his nose. Ed Wood is too optimistic, and too deluded, to mind his reputation. While Edward Bloom may put some distance between his home and the outside world through his tall tales, everybody loves him, and he’s very pleased with his life. And Victor is solitary but not lonely; he seems happy to stay in his attic, making movies with Sparky (a childhood I can relate to, minus the dog).

Other Burton heroes, if less content, have some sort of safety net. Ennui may plague the king of Halloween, but if Jack Skellington’s subjects don’t always understand him, they still love him. Jack’s passion for Christmas can’t translate into being able to do it, but the attempt reinvigorates him and leads him to Sally. Emily of Corpse Bride may never find true love, but preventing tragedy from befalling other lovers still sets her free. Burton’s Bruce Wayne is dismissed as a “trust fund goody-goody” by day, his impulsive heroics only marginally tolerated and appreciated by night, but he still has Alfred, and a measure of success against crime. Jake Portman is never going to be the happiest boy in the world, but by the end of Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children, he does have friends and his grandpa back.

Advertisement


Edward doesn’t have any of that. Skittish, doe-eyed, scarred from his own hands, he comes into his own movie wounded and vulnerable. His very being risks constant injury to himself and others, a serious liability for a curious and sensitive soul who tries to reach out, touch, and belong to the world he’s brought to. Belonging of any kind is not only denied him, but it’s necessary for his survival that he remains an outcast on the mountain.

The only bittersweet connection he can maintain is his memories of that brief time in the world below, memories that inspire the ice sculptures that give suburbia its snow. The only other protagonist in Burton’s filmography who begins and ends at such a lonely place is Sweeney Todd, but Todd is a hollowed instrument of vengeance who needs only to live until his obsession is fulfilled. Edward is a dog – that is, both Depp and screenwriter Caroline Thompson based the character on loving and longing dogs, with all their unconditional affection, befuddlement towards human inventions, and impulse to wince from scolding and attack. That’s a much more exposed character than a skeleton king or a superhero, even a manic-depressive one.


Even the film is more exposed than many of Burton’s other efforts. Screenwriting 101 inveighs against passive protagonists, but Edward spends most of his movie being led around to places he doesn’t know, told things he doesn’t understand, and reacting rather than acting. Thompson’s screenplay never really explains what Edward is or how he was made, so the story doesn’t have any logical grounding to guard itself with. It’s unfiltered expressionism, the design and performances embodying an emotional experience rather than the experience being part of a more structured and literal-minded plot.

That’s not easy territory for a screenwriter or a director to occupy: since they don’t offer the audience a link back to reality, the film only works if a viewer just gets it. According to a blurb written for The Art of Tim Burton book, even some of Thompson and Burton’s collaborators struggled to “get it.” Stan Winston, accustomed to working through scientific and practical implications to his effects, took a long time to get on board the expressionism express.

Advertisement


There’s also the little matter of Edward bearing an undeniable resemblance to Tim Burton himself. Burton has acknowledged the autobiographical nature of the character to an extent; the sensation of swelling emotion that can’t be expressed was a part of his upbringing and the impetus for the character. But he’s also spoken of seeing the character “more thematically than personally” and even lamented that a reading of the film that centered too much on himself made him feel he “wasn’t one-hundred percent successful” with it.

And reducing Edward Scissorhands down to just how tender it is, is exactly the kind of limited commentary we should avoid. Its supporting characters, inspired by Thompson’s own upbringing, are hysterically funny. The film is unappreciated as an actor’s movie; every time I watch it, I notice something new and fun in the small choices made by its cast, particularly Alan Arkin as Bill. The quirky touches to Bo Welch’s design, Danny Elfman’s score, and Stefan Czapsky’s photography are delightful. The fact that the film isn’t all raw emotion, all the time, leaves the expressionism behind Edward all the more evident when it does appear. That’s why I think it hit me so hard when I first tried to watch it, and why it remains the most successful – and vulnerable – exploration of alienation that Burton has yet made.



Advertisement

Movies News

Review: SAMARITAN, A Sly Stallone Superhero Stumble

Published

on

By

Review: SAMARITAN, A Sly Stallone Superhero Stumble

Hitting the three-quarter-century mark usually means a retirement home, a nursing facility, or if you’re lucky to be blessed with relatively good health and savings to match, living in a gated community in Arizona or Florida.

For Sylvester Stallone, however, it means something else entirely: starring in the first superhero-centered film of his decades-long career in the much-delayed Samaritan. Unfortunately for Stallone and the audience on the other side of the screen, the derivative, turgid, forgettable results won’t get mentioned in a career retrospective, let alone among the ever-expanding list of must-see entries in a genre already well past its peak.

For Stallone, however, it’s better late than never when it involves the superhero genre. Maybe in getting a taste of the MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe) with his walk-on role in the Guardians of the Galaxy sequel several years ago, Stallone thought anything Marvel can do, I can do even better (or just as good in the nebulous definition of the word).

Advertisement

The property Stallone and his team found for him, Samaritan, a little-known graphic novel released by a small, almost negligible, publisher, certainly takes advantage of Stallone’s brute-force physicality and his often underrated talent for near-monosyllabic brooding (e.g., the Rambo series), but too often gives him to little do or say as the lone super-powered survivor, the so-called “Samaritan” of the title, of a lifelong rivalry with his brother, “Nemesis.” Two brothers entered a fire-ravaged building and while both were presumed dead, one brother did survive (Stallone’s Joe Smith, a garbageman by day, an appliance repairman by night).

In the Granite City of screenwriter Bragi F. Schut (Escape Room, Season of the Witch), the United States, and presumably the rest of the world, teeters on economic and political collapse, with a recession spiraling into a depression, steady gigs difficult, if not impossible, to obtain, and the city’s neighborhoods rocked by crime and violence. No one’s safe, not even 13-year-old Sam (Javon Walker), Joe’s neighbor.

When he’s not dodging bullies connected to a gang, he’s falling under the undue influence of Cyrus (Pilou Asbæk), a low-rent gang leader with an outsized ego and the conviction that he and only he can take on Nemesis’s mantle and along with that mantle, a hammer “forged in hate,” to orchestrate a Bane-like plan to plunge the city into chaos and become a wealthy power-broker in the process.

Schut’s woefully underwritten script takes a clumsy, haphazard approach to world-building, relying on a two-minute animated sequence to open Samaritan while a naive, worshipful Sam narrates Samaritan and Nemesis’s supposedly tragic, Cain and Abel-inspired backstory. Schut and director Julius Avery (Overlord) clumsily attempt to contrast Sam’s childish belief in messiah-like, superheroic saviors stepping in to save humanity from itself and its own worst excesses, but following that path leads to authoritarianism and fascism (ideas better, more thoroughly explored in Watchmen and The Boys).

While Sam continues to think otherwise, Stallone’s superhero, 25 years past his last, fatal encounter with his presumably deceased brother, obviously believes superheroes are the problem and not the solution (a somewhat reasonable position), but as Samaritan tracks Joe and Sam’s friendship, Sam giving Joe the son he never had, Joe giving Sam the father he lost to street violence well before the film’s opening scene, it gets closer and closer to embracing, if not outright endorsing Sam’s power fantasies, right through a literally and figuratively explosive ending. Might, as always, wins regardless of how righteous or justified the underlying action.

It’s what superhero audiences want, apparently, and what Samaritan uncritically delivers via a woefully under-rendered finale involving not just unconvincing CGI fire effects, but a videogame cut-scene quality Stallone in a late-film flashback sequence that’s meant to be subversively revelatory, but will instead lead to unintentional laughter for anyone who’s managed to sit the entirety of Samaritan’s one-hour and 40-minute running time.

Advertisement

Samaritan is now streaming worldwide on Prime Video.

Samaritan

Cast
  • Sylvester Stallone
  • Javon ‘Wanna’ Walton
  • Pilou Asbæk

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movies News

Matt Shakman Is In Talks To Direct ‘Fantastic Four’

Published

on

By

According to a new report, Wandavision’s Matt Shakman is in talks to direct the upcoming MCU project, Fantastic Four. Marvel Studios has been very hush-hush regarding Fantastic Four to the point where no official announcements have been made other than the film’s release date. No casting news or literally anything other than rumors has been released regarding the project. We know that Fantastic Four is slated for release on November 8th, 2024, and will be a part of Marvel’s Phase 6. There are also rumors that the cast of the new Fantastic Four will be announced at the D23 Expo on September 9th.

Fantastic Four is still over two years from release, and we assume we will hear more news about the project in the coming months. However, the idea of the Fantastic Four has already been introduced into the MCU. John Krasinski played Reed Richards aka Mr. Fantastic in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. The cameo was a huge deal for fans who have been waiting a long time for the Fantastic Four to enter the MCU. When Disney acquired Twenty Century Fox in 2019 we assumed that the Fox Marvel characters would eventually make their way into the MCU. It’s been 3 years and we already have had an X-Men and Fantastic Four cameo – even if they were from another universe.

Deadline is reporting that Wandavision’s Matt Shakman is in talks to direct Fantastic Four. Shakman served as the director for Wandavision and has had an extensive career. He directed two episodes of Game of Thrones and an episode of The Boys, and he had a long stint on It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia. There is nothing official yet, but Deadline’s sources say that Shakman is currently in talks for the job and things are headed in the right direction.

Advertisement

To be honest, I was a bit more excited when Jon Watts was set to direct. I’m sure Shakman is a good director, but Watts proved he could handle a tentpole superhero film with Spider-Man: Homecoming. Wandavision was good, but Watts’ style would have been perfect for Fantastic Four. The film is probably one of the most anticipated films in Marvel’s upcoming slate films and they need to find the best person they can to direct. Is that Matt Shakman? It could be, but whoever takes the job must realize that Marvel has a lot riding on this movie. The other Fantastic Four films were awful and fans deserve better. Hopefully, Marvel knocks it out of the park as they usually do. You can see for yourself when Fantastic Four hits theaters on November 8th, 2024.

Film Synopsis: One of Marvel’s most iconic families makes it to the big screen: the Fantastic Four.

Source: Deadline

Continue Reading

Movies News

Dan Aykroyd, Chevy Chase Star in ‘Zombie Town’ Mystery Teen Romancer (Exclusive)

Published

on

By

Dan Aykroyd and Chevy Chase have entered Zombie Town, a mystery teen romancer based on author R.L. Stine’s book of the same name.

The indie, now shooting in Ontario, also stars Henry Czerny and co-teen leads Marlon Kazadi and Madi Monroe. The ensemble cast includes Scott Thompson and Bruce McCulloch of the Canadian comedy show Kids in the Hall.

Canadian animator Peter Lepeniotis will direct Zombie Town. Stine’s kid’s book sees a quiet town upended when 12-year-old Mike and his friend, Karen, see a horror movie called Zombie Town and unexpectedly see the title characters leap off the screen and chase them through the theater.

Zombie Town will premiere in U.S. theaters before streaming on Hulu and then ABC Australia in 2023.

“We are delighted to bring the pages of R.L. Stine’s Zombie Town to the screen and equally thrilled to be working with such an exceptional cast and crew on this production. A three-time Nickelodeon Kids Choice Award winner with book sales of over $500 million, R.L. Stine has a phenomenal track record of crafting stories that engage and entertain audiences,” John Gillespie, Trimuse Entertainment founder and executive producer, said in a statement.

Advertisement

Executive producers are Trimuse Entertainment, Toonz Media Group, Lookout Entertainment, Viva Pictures and Sons of Anarchy actor Kim Coates.  

Paco Alvarez and Mark Holdom of Trimuse negotiated the deal to acquire the rights to Stine’s Zombie Town book.

Continue Reading

Trending