Connect with us

Movies News

25 Years After ‘Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery’, Can James Bond Have Fun Again?

Published

on

25 Years After ‘Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery’, Can James Bond Have Fun Again?

No Time to Die marked the definitive end of Daniel Craig‘s tenure as James Bond. His five-film run began in 2006 with Casino Royale, a still electrifying movie that brought Bond down to the real world from the light-hearted, rather silly realm of his predecessor, Pierce Brosnan. Craig’s Bond arrived at a time where mainstream, blockbuster cinema took a hard pivot into seriousness. From The Bourne Identity to Batman Begins, action films were concerned with creating a world of plausibility, where every possible outlandish element could be backed up by pseudo-practicality and tactility. For Bond, this meant limiting the gadgets and one-liners, replacing fun travelog elements with deep character drama, and morphing Bond from a Lothario into a blunt instrument. The gambit paid off, and many see Craig as the best actor to ever take up the 007 moniker.

RELATED: ‘No Time to Die’ to ‘Skyfall’: Daniel Craig’s James Bond Films, Ranked

Advertisement

The tonal change in the mid-2000s was a necessary one, though not just because they wanted to fit in the overall direction of blockbuster moviemaking. Producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson needed to escape a specter, if you will, that had really ripped apart the franchise for nearly a decade prior to the release of Casino Royale. That specter was the James Bond spoof created by Mike Myers in 1997, Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery. That film and its two sequels, The Spy Who Shagged Me and Goldmember, so thoroughly made fun of every trope of the Bond series and left such an indelible impression on the public that watching a James Bond film without seeing some hint of Austin Powers inside of it became nearly impossible. Daniel Craig even said of why they chose the direction they did, “We had to destroy the myth because Mike Myers fucked us.”


As the film turns 25 in 2022, many may not realize what a colossal pop-cultural force Austin Powers was in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The crushed velvet-suited, glasses-wearing secret agent was inescapable. Everyone and their mom did impressions of Powers and his arch-rival, Dr. Evil. Nearly every line became part of the popular lexicon. School kids on the playground would shout “Do I make you horny, baby?” and parents would just laugh, thinking about the good time they had watching that movie. It was a true phenomenon.

The status of Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery as a monumental force was not immediately apparent. That film took in a respectable, but nowhere near extraordinary, $53.8 million at the domestic box office and just $13.8 million everywhere else. Where the movie really found its mojo was on home video. 1997 was primetime for the VHS and also the first year of commercially available DVDs in North America, and the film found a whole new life, racking up purchases and rentals. Its popularity grew and grew to the point where, in 1999, the first sequel The Spy Who Shagged Me made $54.9 million in its opening weekend. It became the first sequel in history to outgross the previous film’s entire box office run in its opening weekend. Eventually, the film exceeded $300 million at the worldwide box office. Three years later, Goldmember would make just under $300 million.


All three of these films came out the same year as a Pierce Brosnan-led James Bond film, with Powers releasing in the summer and Bond in the winter. Domestically, Austin Powers stomped James Bond at the box office once the phenomenon settled in. The Spy Who Shagged Me took in a whopping $80 million more than 1999’s Bond entry The World Is Not Enough. 2002’s Die Another Day, which brought in a massive star and freshly minted Oscar winner in Halle Berry to be the co-lead, still was no match for Goldmember, falling $43 million short of that film’s gross. The interest had clearly shifted away to the films that knew they were silly from the ones where you were not quite sure if they knew.

Advertisement

The Austin Powers trilogy tackled everything that made Bond what it was and expertly turned it into a joke. Seeing a bald Mike Myers in a grey Nehru suit inside a hollowed-out volcano lair no longer made the larger-than-life adversaries of James Bond formidable opponents. Taking the innuendo-laden names of Bond girls and amping them up to “Alotta Fagina” and “Ivana Humpalot” no longer made the implied names that amusing. Sharks with laser beams attached to their heads took the menace out of any elaborate trap the villain would put Bond in. It got so deep inside Bond that even a film like Spectre, which came out over a decade after Powers had been put to bed, bears a striking resemblance to Goldmember in the relationship between Bond and Blofeld (Christoph Waltz) in regards to Powers and Dr. Evil.


All that being said, Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery came out 25 years ago. The character last appeared on screen 20 years ago. Like many comedy phenomena before and after it, the cultural caché of Austin Powers now is nowhere near as strong as it was when the films were being made. You say “Yeah, baby” or “Oh, behave” to someone now, and you are just as likely to get a full-body cringe from that person as you are a chuckle. Two decades is a long enough time to rethink what the public is willing to buy in a James Bond film and start introducing some of those more outlandish, iconic elements back into the series.

No Time to Die hinted at the transition back to basics. It brought back the elaborate secret lair on a remote island, complete with a garden of poisonous plants. Blofeld had his cronies carry around his robotic eye on a pillow for his birthday. These things were still played incredibly straight though. Effective, but serious. Craig got to deliver a few jokes, which I am sure was a relief to him, but those were counterbalanced with easily the most dramatic and emotional material any Bond has ever had to play.


Barbara Broccoli and Michael G. Wilson have an incredible opportunity in front of them. They have a completely blank slate with which to work, and any direction is possible. You can have some fun with Bond again. The biggest behemoth in Hollywood, Marvel, already has laid the groundwork for more lighthearted fare for the big blockbusters, and Eon Productions could push that even further. More importantly, they no longer have the burden of living in a world dominated by Mike Myers’s creation. Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery is still a howling good time after all these years (the sequels to varying degrees), but its cultural importance has waned. James Bond can be whatever it wants to be now, and in a time where many are looking for a smile and a good time, what better place to find it than with a character that has delivered just that for 60 years on screen?

Advertisement


Advertisement

Movies News

Review: SAMARITAN, A Sly Stallone Superhero Stumble

Published

on

By

Review: SAMARITAN, A Sly Stallone Superhero Stumble

Hitting the three-quarter-century mark usually means a retirement home, a nursing facility, or if you’re lucky to be blessed with relatively good health and savings to match, living in a gated community in Arizona or Florida.

For Sylvester Stallone, however, it means something else entirely: starring in the first superhero-centered film of his decades-long career in the much-delayed Samaritan. Unfortunately for Stallone and the audience on the other side of the screen, the derivative, turgid, forgettable results won’t get mentioned in a career retrospective, let alone among the ever-expanding list of must-see entries in a genre already well past its peak.

For Stallone, however, it’s better late than never when it involves the superhero genre. Maybe in getting a taste of the MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe) with his walk-on role in the Guardians of the Galaxy sequel several years ago, Stallone thought anything Marvel can do, I can do even better (or just as good in the nebulous definition of the word).

Advertisement

The property Stallone and his team found for him, Samaritan, a little-known graphic novel released by a small, almost negligible, publisher, certainly takes advantage of Stallone’s brute-force physicality and his often underrated talent for near-monosyllabic brooding (e.g., the Rambo series), but too often gives him to little do or say as the lone super-powered survivor, the so-called “Samaritan” of the title, of a lifelong rivalry with his brother, “Nemesis.” Two brothers entered a fire-ravaged building and while both were presumed dead, one brother did survive (Stallone’s Joe Smith, a garbageman by day, an appliance repairman by night).

In the Granite City of screenwriter Bragi F. Schut (Escape Room, Season of the Witch), the United States, and presumably the rest of the world, teeters on economic and political collapse, with a recession spiraling into a depression, steady gigs difficult, if not impossible, to obtain, and the city’s neighborhoods rocked by crime and violence. No one’s safe, not even 13-year-old Sam (Javon Walker), Joe’s neighbor.

When he’s not dodging bullies connected to a gang, he’s falling under the undue influence of Cyrus (Pilou Asbæk), a low-rent gang leader with an outsized ego and the conviction that he and only he can take on Nemesis’s mantle and along with that mantle, a hammer “forged in hate,” to orchestrate a Bane-like plan to plunge the city into chaos and become a wealthy power-broker in the process.

Schut’s woefully underwritten script takes a clumsy, haphazard approach to world-building, relying on a two-minute animated sequence to open Samaritan while a naive, worshipful Sam narrates Samaritan and Nemesis’s supposedly tragic, Cain and Abel-inspired backstory. Schut and director Julius Avery (Overlord) clumsily attempt to contrast Sam’s childish belief in messiah-like, superheroic saviors stepping in to save humanity from itself and its own worst excesses, but following that path leads to authoritarianism and fascism (ideas better, more thoroughly explored in Watchmen and The Boys).

While Sam continues to think otherwise, Stallone’s superhero, 25 years past his last, fatal encounter with his presumably deceased brother, obviously believes superheroes are the problem and not the solution (a somewhat reasonable position), but as Samaritan tracks Joe and Sam’s friendship, Sam giving Joe the son he never had, Joe giving Sam the father he lost to street violence well before the film’s opening scene, it gets closer and closer to embracing, if not outright endorsing Sam’s power fantasies, right through a literally and figuratively explosive ending. Might, as always, wins regardless of how righteous or justified the underlying action.

It’s what superhero audiences want, apparently, and what Samaritan uncritically delivers via a woefully under-rendered finale involving not just unconvincing CGI fire effects, but a videogame cut-scene quality Stallone in a late-film flashback sequence that’s meant to be subversively revelatory, but will instead lead to unintentional laughter for anyone who’s managed to sit the entirety of Samaritan’s one-hour and 40-minute running time.

Advertisement

Samaritan is now streaming worldwide on Prime Video.

Samaritan

Cast
  • Sylvester Stallone
  • Javon ‘Wanna’ Walton
  • Pilou Asbæk

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Movies News

Matt Shakman Is In Talks To Direct ‘Fantastic Four’

Published

on

By

According to a new report, Wandavision’s Matt Shakman is in talks to direct the upcoming MCU project, Fantastic Four. Marvel Studios has been very hush-hush regarding Fantastic Four to the point where no official announcements have been made other than the film’s release date. No casting news or literally anything other than rumors has been released regarding the project. We know that Fantastic Four is slated for release on November 8th, 2024, and will be a part of Marvel’s Phase 6. There are also rumors that the cast of the new Fantastic Four will be announced at the D23 Expo on September 9th.

Fantastic Four is still over two years from release, and we assume we will hear more news about the project in the coming months. However, the idea of the Fantastic Four has already been introduced into the MCU. John Krasinski played Reed Richards aka Mr. Fantastic in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness. The cameo was a huge deal for fans who have been waiting a long time for the Fantastic Four to enter the MCU. When Disney acquired Twenty Century Fox in 2019 we assumed that the Fox Marvel characters would eventually make their way into the MCU. It’s been 3 years and we already have had an X-Men and Fantastic Four cameo – even if they were from another universe.

Deadline is reporting that Wandavision’s Matt Shakman is in talks to direct Fantastic Four. Shakman served as the director for Wandavision and has had an extensive career. He directed two episodes of Game of Thrones and an episode of The Boys, and he had a long stint on It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia. There is nothing official yet, but Deadline’s sources say that Shakman is currently in talks for the job and things are headed in the right direction.

Advertisement

To be honest, I was a bit more excited when Jon Watts was set to direct. I’m sure Shakman is a good director, but Watts proved he could handle a tentpole superhero film with Spider-Man: Homecoming. Wandavision was good, but Watts’ style would have been perfect for Fantastic Four. The film is probably one of the most anticipated films in Marvel’s upcoming slate films and they need to find the best person they can to direct. Is that Matt Shakman? It could be, but whoever takes the job must realize that Marvel has a lot riding on this movie. The other Fantastic Four films were awful and fans deserve better. Hopefully, Marvel knocks it out of the park as they usually do. You can see for yourself when Fantastic Four hits theaters on November 8th, 2024.

Film Synopsis: One of Marvel’s most iconic families makes it to the big screen: the Fantastic Four.

Source: Deadline

Continue Reading

Movies News

Dan Aykroyd, Chevy Chase Star in ‘Zombie Town’ Mystery Teen Romancer (Exclusive)

Published

on

By

Dan Aykroyd and Chevy Chase have entered Zombie Town, a mystery teen romancer based on author R.L. Stine’s book of the same name.

The indie, now shooting in Ontario, also stars Henry Czerny and co-teen leads Marlon Kazadi and Madi Monroe. The ensemble cast includes Scott Thompson and Bruce McCulloch of the Canadian comedy show Kids in the Hall.

Canadian animator Peter Lepeniotis will direct Zombie Town. Stine’s kid’s book sees a quiet town upended when 12-year-old Mike and his friend, Karen, see a horror movie called Zombie Town and unexpectedly see the title characters leap off the screen and chase them through the theater.

Zombie Town will premiere in U.S. theaters before streaming on Hulu and then ABC Australia in 2023.

“We are delighted to bring the pages of R.L. Stine’s Zombie Town to the screen and equally thrilled to be working with such an exceptional cast and crew on this production. A three-time Nickelodeon Kids Choice Award winner with book sales of over $500 million, R.L. Stine has a phenomenal track record of crafting stories that engage and entertain audiences,” John Gillespie, Trimuse Entertainment founder and executive producer, said in a statement.

Advertisement

Executive producers are Trimuse Entertainment, Toonz Media Group, Lookout Entertainment, Viva Pictures and Sons of Anarchy actor Kim Coates.  

Paco Alvarez and Mark Holdom of Trimuse negotiated the deal to acquire the rights to Stine’s Zombie Town book.

Continue Reading

Trending